The starting point is release, not detention
Canadian law presumes release at the earliest opportunity on the least onerous conditions. The Crown must justify detention, and only on defined grounds: ensuring attendance in court, protecting the public, or maintaining confidence in the administration of justice.
For certain offences the burden reverses — a **reverse onus** — and you must show why you should be released rather than the Crown showing why you should not. That applies to defined categories including some firearm and trafficking offences and offences allegedly committed while already on release.
Sureties and what they're agreeing to
A surety is someone who supervises you in the community and pledges money that can be forfeited if you breach. They are not simply providing a character reference — they undertake real obligations, including reporting breaches to police.
Courts assess whether the surety knows the allegations, has a genuine ability to supervise, and has the pledged funds. A well-prepared surety with a concrete plan — where you will live, who will monitor what — frequently makes the difference between release and detention.
The conditions that cause the most trouble
Common terms include reporting to police, residing at a specified address, curfews or house arrest, no contact with named people, geographic exclusions, abstaining from alcohol or drugs, and weapons prohibitions.
Two cause the most breaches. **No-contact conditions are absolute** — contact through a third party, or replying when the other person contacts you, still breaches. **Residence conditions** mean you cannot simply stay elsewhere, even with family, without a variation. Assume nothing is flexible.
Breach is a separate offence — and it compounds
Failing to comply is a distinct criminal charge, prosecuted alongside the original. It also undermines your position at every later stage: a subsequent bail hearing becomes a reverse onus, and the breach is before the court at sentencing.
The practical rule is that a technical breach of a minor condition damages your case more than the underlying allegation often does. Treat every condition as strict, including ones that seem trivial.
Varying conditions, and bail review
Conditions can be varied with Crown consent or by application, and this is routinely done as circumstances change — a new job that conflicts with a curfew, a move, or a need to contact someone for a legitimate reason such as childcare arrangements.
**Do the variation before breaching, never after.** If you were detained, a bail review in the superior court is available, and material change or fresh evidence can justify release. Both are things to raise with counsel promptly rather than enduring unworkable conditions.
Frequently asked questions
- Do I need money to get bail?
- Not usually. Cash deposits are uncommon in Canada; most release is on an undertaking or recognizance, sometimes with a surety pledging an amount that is only forfeited on breach.
- What does a surety actually agree to?
- To supervise you, ensure you attend court and follow conditions, and report breaches to police — with a pledged sum at risk. It is a real legal obligation, not a character reference.
- The complainant contacted me — can I reply?
- No. A no-contact condition binds you regardless of who initiated it. Do not respond; tell your lawyer and document that it happened.
- Can conditions be changed?
- Yes, by consent or application. Do it before breaching — a variation is routine, a breach is a new charge.
- Is duty counsel free?
- Yes. Duty counsel assists at bail hearings at no cost, and legal aid may cover ongoing representation depending on income.
This guide is general information, not legal advice. Laws, costs, and procedures vary by state, province, and your specific situation — speak with a qualified criminal defense lawyer about your circumstances before acting.